Enthusiasm Over Growth Hormone's
Potential Is Strong Despite Side Effects
Tuesday, February 24, 1998; Page Z16
As recently as two decades ago, medical experts thought that growth
hormone didn't do much in adult bodies. They believed that once a child
had grown to his or her final height, the job of this protein messenger made
by the pituitary gland was finished.
That view began to change, says Marc R. Blackman of Johns Hopkins
School of Medicine, when researchers found that adults with pituitary
glands that could no longer make growth hormone seemed to grow old
before their time -- losing muscle and bone mass, gaining fat, and
developing diabetes and heart disease -- and that giving such patients
supplemental growth hormone could remove those hallmarks of aging.
Scientific and popular interest in the possible anti-aging properties of
growth hormone ignited with the 1990 publication of a landmark study by
Daniel Rudman of the Medical College of Wisconsin. Rudman treated 12
healthy men, aged 61 to 81, with injections of growth hormone three times
a week for six months and compared them with nine similar men who
received no treatment. Men who received the hormone showed marked
increases in lean body mass and skin thickness, a dramatic drop in body
fat, and some increase in bone density. The effects of six months of human
growth hormone on the body's muscle and fat content were equivalent in
magnitude to the changes incurred during 10 to 20 years of aging,
Rudman wrote.
In response to these findings, Blackman said, the National Institute on
Aging awarded eight grants for larger studies of the role of growth
hormone treatment -- with and without supplemental sex hormones and
exercise -- in preserving the health of tissues and organs in elderly people.
Among the many factors being measured are muscle strength, bone mass,
body fat content, heart function, blood sugar, cholesterol and fats in the
blood, immune function and psychological health. All of these studies are
underway, and results are expected within the next two to three years.
Blackman emphasized that for now, both the safety and the long-term
benefits of growth hormone are still uncertain. Reported side effects,
especially with high doses, include high blood pressure, carpal tunnel
syndrome (pain, weakness and tingling in the fingers caused by
compression of a nerve), headaches and diabetes. Such side effects can
usually be reversed by stopping treatment or reducing the dose, Blackman
said.
The biggest concern, he added, is that growth hormone and IGF-1, a
related substance made by the body that directs the growth hormone's
effects, may increase cancer risk. To date there is no evidence
whatsoever that growth hormone and IGF-1 cause cancers to increase,
Blackman said. On the other hand, there is clear-cut evidence in animals
and humans that both hormones can cause enlargement or expansion of
existing cancers, including breast cancer. Last month in the journal
Science, a study of more than 14,000 doctors reported that the quarter of
the group with the highest blood levels of IGF-1 had four times as great a
risk of prostate cancer as the quarter with the lowest levels.
Blackman, who is directing a federally funded hormone trial at Hopkins,
said anyone with possible cancer is excluded from that study, and that
participants are monitored closely for malignancies.
He said it already appears that growth hormone takes longer to produce
beneficial effects in some tissues than in others. Body fat content decreases
quickly but muscle mass and bone density take a year or longer to
respond. Long-term treatment may also make the heart work better and
improve the body's metabolism of sugar.
Blackman predicted that if the results of the first round of studies are
promising, researchers will need to continue to test the hormone in larger
groups of people for longer periods of time.
Genetically engineered human growth hormone was first approved by the
FDA in 1985, but only for children who had failed to grow normally
because their bodies didn't make enough of the hormone. Four companies
-- Genentech, Eli Lilly, Pharmacia/Upjohn and Serono -- make genetically
engineered human growth hormone. In the past two years, the FDA has
approved the products of the first three companies for growth hormone
deficiency in adults. It approved Serono's product in 1996 for the
treatment of weight loss and muscle wasting caused by AIDS. But none of
the treatments are approved for healthy elderly people who are not
deficient in growth hormone.
Nevertheless, some physicians have responded to the rising interest in
growth hormone by signing up to buy supplies of the product that they can
resell to their elderly patients, said Randall Lusson, vice president of HGH
Corp., a Phoenix-based company that buys the hormone from
Pharmacia/Upjohn and sells it to physicians for less than a pharmacy would
charge. The treatment, which must be injected several times a week, costs
patients $5,000 or more per year, depending on the dose prescribed.
In an interview, Lusson said his company had enrolled between 150 and
200 doctors during its first two months of existence. He said about four or
five new doctors were signing up each week. Pretty much all of the
doctors we sell to are taking it themselves, Lusson said. Then, if they like
the effect, they start prescribing it to patients. . . . I don't think any of our
doctors are using it for younger persons.
A spokesman for Pharmacia/Upjohn said the company is not studying
growth hormone as a treatment for non-hormone-deficient elderly people
and has no plans to request approval for that purpose. We know it's going
on out there, but it's not something we're promoting, he said.
Medical researchers, as a group . . . always paralyze themselves with
caveats, he said. It's so much easier to remove the caveats and tell
consumers, 'This stuff works. Buy it, and buy it from me.'
© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company